Hilbert’s Program An Essay on Mathematical Instrumentalism

Hilbert's Program was founded on a concern for the phenomenon of paradox in mathematics. To Hilbert, the paradoxes, which are at once both absurd and irresistible, revealed a deep philosophical truth: namely, that there is a discrepancy between the laws accord­ ing to which the mind of homo mat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Detlefsen, M.
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Dordrecht Springer Netherlands 1986, 1986
Edition:1st ed. 1986
Series:Synthese Library, Studies in Epistemology, Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science
Subjects:
Online Access:
Collection: Springer Book Archives -2004 - Collection details see MPG.ReNa
LEADER 02831nmm a2200325 u 4500
001 EB000720504
003 EBX01000000000000000573586
005 00000000000000.0
007 cr|||||||||||||||||||||
008 140122 ||| eng
020 |a 9789401577311 
100 1 |a Detlefsen, M. 
245 0 0 |a Hilbert’s Program  |h Elektronische Ressource  |b An Essay on Mathematical Instrumentalism  |c by M. Detlefsen 
250 |a 1st ed. 1986 
260 |a Dordrecht  |b Springer Netherlands  |c 1986, 1986 
300 |a XIV, 186 p  |b online resource 
505 0 |a I: The Philosophical Fundamentals of Hilbert’s Program -- II: A Closer Look at the Problems -- III: The Gödelian Challenge -- IV: The Stability Problem -- V: The Convergence Problem and the Problem of Strict Instrumentalism -- Appendix: Hilbert’s Program and the First Theorem -- References 
653 |a Mathematical logic 
653 |a Logic 
653 |a History 
653 |a Mathematical Logic and Foundations 
653 |a Mathematics 
653 |a History of Mathematical Sciences 
041 0 7 |a eng  |2 ISO 639-2 
989 |b SBA  |a Springer Book Archives -2004 
490 0 |a Synthese Library, Studies in Epistemology, Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science 
028 5 0 |a 10.1007/978-94-015-7731-1 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7731-1?nosfx=y  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
082 0 |a 160 
520 |a Hilbert's Program was founded on a concern for the phenomenon of paradox in mathematics. To Hilbert, the paradoxes, which are at once both absurd and irresistible, revealed a deep philosophical truth: namely, that there is a discrepancy between the laws accord­ ing to which the mind of homo mathematicus works, and the laws governing objective mathematical fact. Mathematical epistemology is, therefore, to be seen as a struggle between a mind that naturally works in one way and a reality that works in another. Knowledge occurs when the two cooperate. Conceived in this way, there are two basic alternatives for mathematical epistemology: a skeptical position which maintains either that mind and reality seldom or never come to agreement, or that we have no very reliable way of telling when they do; and a non-skeptical position which holds that there is significant agree­ ment between mind and reality, and that their potential discrepan­ cies can be detected, avoided, and thus kept in check. Of these two, Hilbert clearly embraced the latter, and proposed a program designed to vindicate the epistemological riches represented by our natural, if non-literal, ways of thinking. Brouwer, on the other hand, opted for a position closer (in Hilbert's opinion) to that of the skeptic. Having decided that epistemological purity could come only through sacrifice, he turned his back on his classical heritage to accept a higher calling