Cover Image
Read Now

Moral Knowledge

As its title indicates, this book is concerned with two different fields of philosophy, ethics and epistemology. The bulk of the argument is devoted to epistemological questions, as these arise within the context of morality. Hence, the conclusions I reach could probably best be described as prolego...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Johnson, Oliver A.
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Dordrecht Springer Netherlands 1966, 1966
Edition:1st ed. 1966
Subjects:
Ethics
Philosophy Of Mind
Knowledge, Theory Of
Epistemology
Moral Philosophy And Applied Ethics
Online Access:
Collection: Springer Book Archives -2004 - Collection details see MPG.ReNa
Table of Contents:
  • 7. The principle of personal impartiality
  • 8. Egoism and morality
  • 9. The deductive fallacy
  • VIII. Toward a General Theory of Morality
  • 1. Outline of a positive theory of obligation
  • 2. Practical qualifications
  • 3. Morality and utility
  • 4. Goodness and the naturalistic fallacy
  • 2. The revolution in philosophy
  • 3. Wittgenstein
  • 4. Analysis and moral philosophy
  • 5. Analysis and the problem of moral knowledge
  • V. Duty and Ordinary Language
  • 1. An interpretation of Toulmin’s conclusions
  • 2. A reinterpretation of Toulmin’s conclusions
  • 3. Good reasons and generally accepted reasons
  • 4. Toulmin’s theory and the deductive fallacy
  • 5. Does Toulmin escape the deductive fallacy?
  • 6. Summary comments on Toulmin’s moral theory
  • 7. Nowell-Smith and the problem of moral knowledge
  • 8. Wittgenstein and the revolution in philosophy
  • VI. A Return to Intuitionism
  • 1. The deductive fallacy, skepticism, and intuitionism
  • 2. A defense of intuitionism
  • 3. Knowledge and a plurality of intuitions
  • 4. Intuitive self-evidence and moral knowledge
  • VII. Reason and Duty
  • 1. Two notions ofself-evidence
  • 2. Preliminary objections
  • 3. Duty and good reasons
  • 4. A moral axiom
  • 5. A story
  • 6. Elaboration and comments
  • I. The Problem of Moral Knowledge
  • 1. Contemporary sources of moral skepticism
  • 2. Hume and the deductive fallacy
  • 3. The meaning of moral obligation
  • 4. The criteria of knowledge
  • 5. Plan of the book
  • II. Duty and Goodness
  • 1. Types of theory
  • 2. The deontologists’ critique of utilitarianism
  • 3. Intuitionistic utilitarianism as a theory of moral knowledge
  • 4. The identification of goodness and duty
  • 5. The “ought-to-be” argument
  • 6. The deductive argument-a restatement
  • 7. The appeal to self-evidence
  • 8. Reductionistic utilitarianism
  • 9. Moral goodness and duty
  • 10. Duty and goodness and the “ought” and the “is”
  • III. Duty and Rightness
  • 1. The intuitionism of the deontologists
  • 2. Prichard’s “unreasonable” theory
  • 3. The self-evidence of our duties
  • 4. The duty to keep promises
  • 5. Intuition and generalization
  • 6. Rightness and duty
  • 7. From rightness to duty
  • IV. A New Point of View
  • 1. Oxford philosophy

Similar Items