Flexible Syntax A Theory of Case and Arguments

Most linguistic theories assume that each grammatical relation is established in a unique structural configuration. Neeleman and Weerman take issue with this view, arguing for a more flexible approach on the basis of conceptual considerations and data taken mostly, but not exclusively, from the Germ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Neeleman, A., Weerman, F. (Author)
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Dordrecht Springer Netherlands 1999, 1999
Edition:1st ed. 1999
Series:Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory
Subjects:
Online Access:
Collection: Springer Book Archives -2004 - Collection details see MPG.ReNa
LEADER 03380nmm a2200385 u 4500
001 EB000718202
003 EBX01000000000000000571284
005 00000000000000.0
007 cr|||||||||||||||||||||
008 140122 ||| eng
020 |a 9789401142892 
100 1 |a Neeleman, A. 
245 0 0 |a Flexible Syntax  |h Elektronische Ressource  |b A Theory of Case and Arguments  |c by A. Neeleman, F. Weerman 
250 |a 1st ed. 1999 
260 |a Dordrecht  |b Springer Netherlands  |c 1999, 1999 
300 |a XI, 253 p  |b online resource 
505 0 |a 1: Prologue -- 1. Introduction -- 2. Case Theory -- 3. ?-Theory -- 4. Word Order -- 5. Overview -- Bibliographical Note -- 2: The OV/VO Parameter -- 1. Introduction -- 2. The Domain of ?-role Assignment -- 3. The Domains of Head Government -- 4. The Formation of VP Shells -- 5. Particles -- 6. Scrambling -- 7. Double Object Constructions -- 8. Exceptional Case Marking -- 9. Concluding Remarks -- 3: Morphological Case -- 1. Introduction -- 2. Asymmetries between Nominative and Case -- 3. Syntactic Effects of Morphological Case -- 4. Toward a Theory of Case Features -- 5. Concluding Remarks -- 4: Prepositional Complements -- 1. Introduction -- 2. The Problem -- 3. Indirect ?-Role Assignment -- 4. LF Incorporation -- 5. Empirical Consequences -- 6. PP Complements to Nouns -- 7. Concluding Remarks -- 5: Raising to Subject -- 1. Introduction -- 2. ?-Role Promotion as A’-Movement -- 3. NP Raising as Null Operator Movement -- 4. Short versus Long Null Operator Movement -- 5. Improper Movement -- 6. Concluding Remarks -- 6: Head Marking -- 1. Introduction -- 2. Head-Marking Affixes -- 3. Absolutive-Ergative Languages -- 4. VSO Languages -- 5. The Linearization of Subjects -- 6. Concluding Remarks -- 7: Epilogue -- 1. Introduction -- 2. Falsifiability -- 3. Flexibility -- References 
653 |a Syntax 
653 |a Theoretical Linguistics / Grammar 
653 |a Historical Linguistics 
653 |a Linguistics 
653 |a Germanic Languages 
653 |a Germanic languages 
653 |a Comparative linguistics 
653 |a Comparative Linguistics 
653 |a Historical linguistics 
653 |a Grammar, Comparative and general / Syntax 
700 1 |a Weerman, F.  |e [author] 
041 0 7 |a eng  |2 ISO 639-2 
989 |b SBA  |a Springer Book Archives -2004 
490 0 |a Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 
028 5 0 |a 10.1007/978-94-011-4289-2 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4289-2?nosfx=y  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
082 0 |a 410.1 
520 |a Most linguistic theories assume that each grammatical relation is established in a unique structural configuration. Neeleman and Weerman take issue with this view, arguing for a more flexible approach on the basis of conceptual considerations and data taken mostly, but not exclusively, from the Germanic languages. In-depth analyses of word order phenomena as well as diachronic and typological generalizations motivate a re-evaluation of the role of case in the projection of arguments. Case is shown to provide a syntactic foothold for thematic interpretation, something which is necessary in a grammar that does not allow fixed theta-positions. Thus, this study does not only offer a genuine alternative to many standard assumptions, it also explains why there should be such a thing as case in natural language