Televised Legislatures: Political Information Technology and Public Choice

Our interest in studying televised legislatures was kindled by two episodes. The first was a series of rejections by the U.S. Senate between 1984 and 1986 of resolutions to permit live television coverage of floor proceedings. The second was the 1984 "Camscam affair," the media label given...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Crain, W. Mark, Goff, B. (Author)
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Dordrecht Springer Netherlands 1988, 1988
Edition:1st ed. 1988
Subjects:
Online Access:
Collection: Springer Book Archives -2004 - Collection details see MPG.ReNa
LEADER 04086nmm a2200301 u 4500
001 EB000711769
003 EBX01000000000000000564851
005 00000000000000.0
007 cr|||||||||||||||||||||
008 140122 ||| eng
020 |a 9789400926714 
100 1 |a Crain, W. Mark 
245 0 0 |a Televised Legislatures: Political Information Technology and Public Choice  |h Elektronische Ressource  |c by W. Mark Crain, B. Goff 
250 |a 1st ed. 1988 
260 |a Dordrecht  |b Springer Netherlands  |c 1988, 1988 
300 |a XIV, 122 p  |b online resource 
505 0 |a 1 The Architecture of Constitutions -- 2 Political Information Technology and Public Choice: Background -- Voter Shopping: Experience and Search -- Product Advertising and Information Theory -- Product Advertising as Political Advertising -- Technology and the Costs of Campaigning -- The Rational Voter Model -- Televised Legislatures -- History of Televised Legislatures -- Summary -- 3 Legislative Television: The Transformation of Politicians -- The Relationship Between Citizens and Politicians -- Political Services and the Content of Product Advertising -- Technology and the Relative Cost of Acquiring Political Information: Experience versus Search -- Summary -- 4 The Effect of Televising Legislatures on Elections: The Case of U.S. State Legislatures -- The Advantages to Incumbency in Televised Legislatures: State Lower Chamber -- Test for Reverse Causation -- State Upper Chambers -- Summary -- 5 The Effects of Televised Legislatures on Elections: The Case of the U.S. House of Representatives -- U.S. House Races: Before Versus After TV -- Test for Spurious Correlation -- Summary -- 6 The Effect of Televised Legislatures on the Output of Legislation -- A Model of Television and Legislative Outcomes -- Empirical Estimation -- Summary -- 7 The Politics of Adopting Televised Sessions -- Political Influences on Legislators -- Empirical Model of Support for Television in the U.S. Senate -- Summary -- 8 Modernity -- Appendix 1 Data Sources -- Appendix 2 Data 
653 |a Economic policy 
653 |a Economic Policy 
653 |a Political Science 
653 |a Political science 
700 1 |a Goff, B.  |e [author] 
041 0 7 |a eng  |2 ISO 639-2 
989 |b SBA  |a Springer Book Archives -2004 
028 5 0 |a 10.1007/978-94-009-2671-4 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2671-4?nosfx=y  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
082 0 |a 320 
520 |a Our interest in studying televised legislatures was kindled by two episodes. The first was a series of rejections by the U.S. Senate between 1984 and 1986 of resolutions to permit live television coverage of floor proceedings. The second was the 1984 "Camscam affair," the media label given to a partisan war over camera coverage of U.S. House proceedings. Each episode, if nothing else, made plain the intensity of the feelings that elected representatives feel about televised sessions. Legislative television was not taken lightly by those who had the most to gain or lose. Surveys indicate that legislative watchers, "C-SP AN junkies," number in the millions and penetration of cable access to televised sessions numbered nearly 40 million in 1986. In addition to the direct viewers, television news programs increasingly use excerpts from the televised sessions as enhancements and sources for political reporting. Televising legislatures, in short, has attracted much new attention to the process oflegislating. The innovation and diffusion of the electronic Acropolis has transformed politics in the U.S. Yet, its impact on the democratic process has attracted little notice except from a few political journalists. Our predilections as economists working in the public choice tradition led us into the analysis of several questions surrounding television: What do televised sessions provide for legislators? How are incumbent reelection bids affected? Do all incumbents benefit? How are legislative sessions changed? Has the enactment of laws been influenced? For the most part, these questions had received only cursory treatment