The Philosophy Behind Physics

Thomas Brody had one of the most powerful and wide-ranging intellects of his generation. Although primarily a physicist who worked on statistical prob­ lems in nuclear physics, on probability theory and on computational physics he had an extensive knowledge of the philosophy of science and of philos...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Brody, Thomas A.
Other Authors: Pena, Luis de la (Editor), Hodgson, Peter E. (Editor)
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Berlin, Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 1993, 1993
Edition:1st ed. 1993
Subjects:
Online Access:
Collection: Springer Book Archives -2004 - Collection details see MPG.ReNa
LEADER 04027nmm a2200433 u 4500
001 EB000674564
003 EBX01000000000000000527646
005 00000000000000.0
007 cr|||||||||||||||||||||
008 140122 ||| eng
020 |a 9783642789786 
100 1 |a Brody, Thomas A. 
245 0 0 |a The Philosophy Behind Physics  |h Elektronische Ressource  |c by Thomas A. Brody ; edited by Luis de la Pena, Peter E. Hodgson 
250 |a 1st ed. 1993 
260 |a Berlin, Heidelberg  |b Springer Berlin Heidelberg  |c 1993, 1993 
300 |a XII, 355 p  |b online resource 
505 0 |a I. The Philosophy of Physics -- 1. The Active Epistemology -- 2. Higher-Level Epistemic Cycles -- 3. Systems and Experiments -- 4. The Structure of Theories -- 5. Induction and the Scope of Theories -- 6. The Incommensurability of Theories -- 7. A Minimal Ontology for Scientific Research -- 8. The Determinisms of Physics -- II. The Theory of Probability -- 9. The Nature of Probability -- 10. The Ensemble Interpretation of Probability -- 11. The Philosophy of Ensemble Probability -- 12. On Errors and Approximations -- III. The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics -- 13. Problems and Promises of the Ensemble Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics -- 14. Probability and the Way Out of the Great Quantum Muddle -- 15. Are Hidden Variables Possible? -- 16. The Bell Inequality I: Joint Measurability -- 17. The Bell Inequality II: Locality -- 18. The Irrelevance of the Bell Inequality -- 19. Measurement and State Representation -- 20. On Quantum Logic -- 21. Resistance to Change in the Sciences: The Case of Quantum Mechanics -- IV. General -- 22. Epistemological Implications of Artificial Intelligence -- 23. Artificial Intelligence: Possibilities and Realities, Hopes and Dangers -- 24. Philosophy and Physicists -- 25. The Axiomatic Approach in Physics -- List of Publications of T.A. Brody -- Name Index 
653 |a Humanities and Social Sciences 
653 |a Physical Sciences 
653 |a Humanities 
653 |a Physics and Astronomy 
653 |a Engineering 
653 |a Science 
653 |a Life sciences 
653 |a Social sciences 
653 |a Life Sciences 
653 |a Physics 
653 |a Mathematics 
653 |a Mathematics and Computing 
653 |a Technology and Engineering 
653 |a Astronomy 
700 1 |a Pena, Luis de la  |e [editor] 
700 1 |a Hodgson, Peter E.  |e [editor] 
041 0 7 |a eng  |2 ISO 639-2 
989 |b SBA  |a Springer Book Archives -2004 
028 5 0 |a 10.1007/978-3-642-78978-6 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-78978-6?nosfx=y  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
082 0 |a 500 
520 |a Thomas Brody had one of the most powerful and wide-ranging intellects of his generation. Although primarily a physicist who worked on statistical prob­ lems in nuclear physics, on probability theory and on computational physics he had an extensive knowledge of the philosophy of science and of philosophy, and was fluent in many languages. He is well-known among physicists for the Brody-Moshinsky transformation but his extensive work on probability and on the philosophy of science remained almost unknown. This was because the originality of his ideas entailed many lengthy battles with uncomprehending referees, and he frequently published in Mexican journals of limited circula­ tion. In addition, his strongly critical spirit inhibited his willingness to publish his ideas. He was always most concerned by the very unsatisfactory situation in the philosophy of physics, that is largely due to the generally poor knowledge that physicists and philosophers have of each other's disciplines. Philosophers of science write at length about physics without any detailed first-hand knowl­ edge of how research is actually carried out. Physicists, for their part, often implicitly assume naive or erroneous philosophical ideas, and this often hinders their scientific work, besides spreading further confusion if they try to give an account of what they are doing