The Ethics of Medical Involvement in Capital Punishment A Philosophical Discussion

The morality of capital punishment has been debated for a long time. This however has 1 not resulted in the settlement of the question either way. Philosophers are still divided. In this work I am not addressing the morality of capital punishment per se. My question is different but related. It is t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gaie, Joseph B.R.
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Dordrecht Springer Netherlands 2004, 2004
Edition:1st ed. 2004
Series:International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:
Collection: Springer Book Archives -2004 - Collection details see MPG.ReNa
LEADER 02807nmm a2200301 u 4500
001 EB000615796
003 EBX01000000000000000468878
005 00000000000000.0
007 cr|||||||||||||||||||||
008 140122 ||| eng
020 |a 9781402025396 
100 1 |a Gaie, Joseph B.R. 
245 0 0 |a The Ethics of Medical Involvement in Capital Punishment  |h Elektronische Ressource  |b A Philosophical Discussion  |c by Joseph B.R. Gaie 
250 |a 1st ed. 2004 
260 |a Dordrecht  |b Springer Netherlands  |c 2004, 2004 
300 |a XV, 159 p. 3 illus  |b online resource 
505 0 |a Medicalisation of Capital Punishment -- Role/Professional Versus Ordinary Morality -- The Morality of Euthanasia and Its Implications for the Medicalisation of Capital Punishment -- The Military Doctor -- Medical Involvement in the Wider Capital Punishment Process -- Kantian Theory -- Utilitarian Arguments for Medicalisation -- The Medical Doctor and a Condemned Prisoner 
653 |a Ethics 
653 |a Political Philosophy 
653 |a Political science / Philosophy 
653 |a Moral Philosophy and Applied Ethics 
041 0 7 |a eng  |2 ISO 639-2 
989 |b SBA  |a Springer Book Archives -2004 
490 0 |a International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine 
028 5 0 |a 10.1007/1-4020-2539-4 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2539-4?nosfx=y  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
082 0 |a 170 
520 |a The morality of capital punishment has been debated for a long time. This however has 1 not resulted in the settlement of the question either way. Philosophers are still divided. In this work I am not addressing the morality of capital punishment per se. My question is different but related. It is this. Whether or not capital punishment is morally right, is it moral or immoral for medical doctors to be involved in the practice? To deal with this question I start off in Chapter One delineating the sort of involvement the medical associations consider to be morally problematic for medical doctors in capital punishment. They make a distinction between what they call 2 “medicalisation” of and “involvement” in capital punishment, and argue that there is a moral distinction between the two. Whilst it is morally acceptable for doctors to be “involved” in capital punishment, according to the medical associations, it is immoral to medicalise the practice. I clarify this position and show what moral issues arise. I then suggest that there should not be a distinction between the two. The medical associations argue that the medicalisation of capital punishment, especially the use by medical doctors of lethal injection to execute condemned prisoners is immoral and therefore should be prohibited, because it involves doctors in doing what is against the aims of medicine