Similar Items

• Richard Lord Wenman, of the kingdom of Ireland, appellant. Sir William Osbaldeston, Bar. Dame Katharine his wife, John Churchill Wicksted, Esq; and Mary his wife, respondents. The case of the respondent Mr. Wicksted and his wife
  by: Wicksted, John Churchill
  Published: (1720)
• Hugh Murray Kynnynmound Esq; the only acting trustee under the last settlement of Sir James Rochead of Inverleith bart. deceas'd, in behalf of the whole persons, for whose behoof the said settlement or trust right in granted, and James Dalrymple, an infant, second son of Sir James Dalrymple of Haills bart. by Mr. Hugh Somervill his tutor ad lites. Appellants. Sir James Dalrymple bart. Hugh, Charles, and John Dalrymple infants, sons of the said Sir James Dalrymple; Sir Francis Kinloch bart. and Dame Mary his wife; Mr. Francis Kinloch advocate; David Kinloch, and Alexander Kinloch, sons of the said Sir Francis Kinloch by the said Dame Mary his wife; James Cathcart Esq; and Mrs. Elizabeth Rochead spinster; Alexander Hamilton of Pencaitland, and Thomas Dundas of Letham Esq; and John Rochead, merchant in Edinburgh, respondents. And the said Mr. Francis Kinloch advocate, as one of the heirs of the settlement aforesaid, appellant. The said Sir Francis Kinloch bart. and Dame Mary his wife, and all the other persons abovenamed both appellants and respondents in the foresaid other cause, respondents. The case of the appellants in both appeals
  by: Kynnynmound, Hugh Murray
  Published: (1739)
• Richard Lord Wenman, Viscount Tuam, Baron of Kilmanum, in the Kingdom of Ireland. appellant. Sir William Osbaldeston, Baronet, and Dame Katherine his wife, respondents. The respondent's case
  by: Osbaldeston, William
  Published: (1720)
• Constantine Phipps, Esq; - - - appellant. The Right Honourable Richard Earl of Anglesey, Dame Mary Levinge, otherwise Annesley, Charles Coote, Esq; an infant, by Prudence Coote, widow, his mother and guardian, and Mark White, gent. respondents. The appellant's case
  by: Mulgrave, Constantine Phipps
  Published: (1751)
• Before the Most Noble and Right Honorable the Lords Commissioners of Appeals in Prize Causes. Den Arend Op Zee, Jan Hendrick Siebes, master. Jan Hendrick Siebes, a burgher and inhabitant of Antwerp, and a subject of the Emperor of Germany, the master of the said ship, and claimant on behalf of himself and also of Mess. N. De Wall Veydt, Van Ravestyn and Company, of Ostend, imperial subjects, and others, neutral subjects, the true and lawful owners and proprietors of the goods, wares and merchandizes laden on board the said ship, - - appellant. Robert Sutton, Esquire, commander of His Majesty's ship of war the Dolphin; John Willett Payne, Esquire, commander of His Majesty's ship of war Leander; Henry Savage, Esquire, commander of His Majesty's ship of war Hercules; the Hon. William Carnigie, Esquire, commander of His Majesty's ship of war Enterprize; and Isaac Vaillant, Esquire, commander of His Majesty's ship of war Namesis, the captors; and James Heseltine, Esquire, His Majesty's procurator-general, - - - respondents. On an appeal from the Court of Vice-Admiralty for the island of Barbadoes. Appellant's case
  Published: (1785)