|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
02785nmm a2200325 u 4500 |
| 001 |
EB000400931 |
| 003 |
EBX01000000000000000253984 |
| 005 |
00000000000000.0 |
| 007 |
cr||||||||||||||||||||| |
| 008 |
130626 ||| eng |
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9789400714977
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Casellas, Núria
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Legal Ontology Engineering
|h Elektronische Ressource
|b Methodologies, Modelling Trends, and the Ontology of Professional Judicial Knowledge
|c by Núria Casellas
|
| 250 |
|
|
|a 1st ed. 2011
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Dordrecht
|b Springer Netherlands
|c 2011, 2011
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a XXII, 298 p
|b online resource
|
| 505 |
0 |
|
|a 1 Introduction -- 2 On Ontologies -- 3 Methodologies, Tools and Languages for Ontology Design -- 4 Legal Ontologies -- 5 Modelling Judicial Professional Knowledge: A Case Study -- 6 Some Final Remarks and Issues for Discussion -- References -- Index
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Computer Communication Networks
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Law / History
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Philosophy of Law
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Computer networks
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a Law / Philosophy
|
| 041 |
0 |
7 |
|a eng
|2 ISO 639-2
|
| 989 |
|
|
|b Springer
|a Springer eBooks 2005-
|
| 490 |
0 |
|
|a Law, Governance and Technology Series
|
| 028 |
5 |
0 |
|a 10.1007/978-94-007-1497-7
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1497-7?nosfx=y
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
| 082 |
0 |
|
|a 340.1
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a Enabling information interoperability, fostering legal knowledge usability and reuse, enhancing legal information search, in short, formalizing the complexity of legal knowledge to enhance legal knowledge management are challenging tasks, for which different solutions and lines of research have been proposed. During the last decade, research and applications based on the use of legal ontologies as a technique to represent legal knowledge has raised a very interesting debate about their capacity and limitations to represent conceptual structures in the legal domain. Making conceptual legal knowledge explicit would support the development of a web of legal knowledge, improve communication, create trust and enable and support open data, e-government and e-democracy activities. Moreover, this explicit knowledge is also relevant to the formalization of software agents and the shaping of virtual institutions and multi-agent systems or environments. This book explores the use of ontologism in legal knowledge representation for semantically-enhanced legal knowledge systems or web-based applications. In it, current methodologies, tools and languages used for ontology development are revised, and the book includes an exhaustive revision of existing ontologies in the legal domain. The development of the Ontology of Professional Judicial Knowledge (OPJK) is presented as a case study
|