Bioethics in Law

The idea for Bioethics in Law began more than a decade ago, while I was studying social science and law. I was parti- larly interested in the collaborations that comprised social s- ence in law. Economic and social data in the pioneering Brandeis brief had been used to defend an early 20th-century l...

Full description

Main Author: Spielman, Bethany
Corporate Author: SpringerLink (Online service)
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Totowa, NJ Humana Press 2007, 2007
Edition:1st ed. 2007
Subjects:
Online Access:
Collection: Springer eBooks 2005- - Collection details see MPG.ReNa
LEADER 02205nmm a2200289 u 4500
001 EB000365738
003 EBX01000000000000000218790
005 00000000000000.0
007 cr|||||||||||||||||||||
008 130626 ||| eng
020 |a 9781597452953 
100 1 |a Spielman, Bethany 
245 0 0 |a Bioethics in Law  |h Elektronische Ressource  |c by Bethany Spielman 
250 |a 1st ed. 2007 
260 |a Totowa, NJ  |b Humana Press  |c 2007, 2007 
300 |a 186 p  |b online resource 
505 0 |a How Does Bioethics Help Judicial Reasoning? -- Health Care Ethics Committee Determinations -- Institutional Review Board Determinations -- Bioethics Commission Reports -- Bioethics Scholarship -- Reliability of Bioethics Testimony -- Reliability of Bioethics Testimony -- Reliability of Bioethics Testimony -- Conclusion 
653 |a Medical ethics 
653 |a Theory of Medicine/Bioethics 
710 2 |a SpringerLink (Online service) 
041 0 7 |a eng  |2 ISO 639-2 
989 |b Springer  |a Springer eBooks 2005- 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-295-3?nosfx=y  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
082 0 |a 610.1 
082 0 |a 174.2 
520 |a The idea for Bioethics in Law began more than a decade ago, while I was studying social science and law. I was parti- larly interested in the collaborations that comprised social s- ence in law. Economic and social data in the pioneering Brandeis brief had been used to defend an early 20th-century labor law; surveys of consumer confusion had helped resolve trademark - fringement cases; psychologists’ predictions of future violence had informed capital sentencing decisions. Additionally, Kenneth Clark’s “doll studies,” cited by the Supreme Court in Brown v. Board of Education, had helped change the course of American 1 history. During that time, however, I was most intensely interested in bioethics, a relatively young field whose relationships to law had not been well analyzed. I wondered whether there could or should be a bioethics in law, because bioethics, unlike the social sciences, was not only in its infancy, but also had distinctly normative features, which might not mesh easily with law’s own normativity